Turkish regulation related article on November 2010 monthly briefing
  • As a Turkish Regulatory consultant I had read the article authored by Marcus Navin-Jones published on November 2010 mothly briefing I had noted some misinterpretations of Turkish C.I.C.R. and noted them with their corrections below to prevent an ambiguity on the issue.

    CW Article : (although monomers in polymers are not exempt and therefore must be notified).

    There is no such information provided by the legal text and it has been discussed with MoEF and been indicated that it is not required to notify reacted monomers.

    CW Article : However, the Bylaw was amended this time last year (November 2009) and now specifically addresses this point. The changes allow certain non-Turkish entities to appoint a Turkish-based entity (a so-called ‘representative’) to notify on their behalf.

    This was added to the legal text by the amendment published on 23th of May 2010.

    CW Article : The requirement to notify new substances came into effect as of 1 January 2010. Therefore, if an entity imported a new substance into Turkey in January of this year, that entity has just two months left to submit its notification.

    The legal text clearly defines as Article 7 Subparagraph 2 : 12 months plus 3 months to notify any substance either manufactured or imported to be notified from the first date of import.

    CW Article : The ministry is required to publish a list of all substances manufactured or imported in quantities above 1,000 tonnes/year. The exact data submitted during the notification procedure to be made publicly available by the ministry is unclear.

    On the legal text it is texted as :
    Article 7 sub paragraph (5): Ministry will publish a list including substances produced on its own or imported on its own
    or in a preparation, thousand tonnes or more per year. So it is not stated as all data but only as list of substances .

    Best Regards
    Melih Babayigit / CRAD Turkiye
  • Comment posted on behalf of the author Marcus Navin-Jones of Keller and Heckman:

    Mr Babayigit, many thanks for your comments. There are intrinsic ambiguities contained within the legal text of the Bylaw itself. My article was based on some of these ambiguities. However, parts of the article itself could have been clearer. Monomers in imported polymers are exempt from notification while monomers as such are not. From the English translation of the text, it is unclear whether the additional 3 month provision simply requires notifiers to notify after 15 months or to complete their notifications within the 3 month period. The draft November 2009 Amendment came into effect on 23 May 2010. The relevant parts of the article will be updated to more accurately reflect these points.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Welcome to the Chemical Watch Forum. Please participate and share your knowledge, questions and concerns with others in the chemical control community. Find out more about Chemical Watch at: ChemicalWatch.com.
Anonymous submissions Want to add a comment or discussion incognito?
Just email A Chemical Watcher at ChemicalWatcher.A@chemicalwatch.com and we'll post them to the Forum on your behalf
Inappropriate content Let Chemical Watch know by emailing ChemicalWatcher.A@chemicalwatch.com
Disclaimers
- Messages from registered users should not be construed as professional, technical or legal advice, and registered users who post messages accept no liability in respect to actions carried out on the basis of comments made in messages. Readers are entirely responsible for the actions they take in reliance on Forum messages

- Chemical Watch can accept no liability in respect of the content of any messages, including the accuracy or truthfulness of any such messages or any responsibility for the consequences of your acting in reliance on such messages. We do not endorse any opinions expressed by any registered users in any messages

For more information, see the Forum's Code of Conduct